Red Letter Revolution

Brueggemann seeks in this writing to use a post-critical approach to the Psalms that incorporates both the popular devotional use of the psalms and the intellectual critical understanding of the Psalms. He gives three reasons for this approach. 1. There is already a well established interpretation of the Psalms in service of the Gospel that focuses on the nice psalms and often looks at them through a romanticized tint. 2. The Psalms are taken as a resource of faith, especially during the Reformation. This tradition is continued in the present-day Protestant church. It is characterized by the notion that “The Psalms articulate the whole Gospel of God in a nutshell.” 3. We are also critical people. The scholarly emphasis cannot and should not be ignored. For example, Gunkel’s Form-Critical approach has led to a greater understanding of the limited recurring patterns of the psalms, and Westermann’s interesting conclusion that lament is the most basic form of the psalm from which all others derive. Using these ideas, Brueggemann constructs a structure of the psalms in three parts: Psalms of Orientation, Psalms of Disorientation, and Psalms of New Orientation. He argues that these categories correspond with both the critical understanding of the Psalms and the human experience of joy, suffering, and renewal. Brueggemann may claim that he is incorporating the devotional aspect with this method, but in truth he simply segregates all the devotionally used psalms to one category in a way that is slightly condescending to their popular usage. Nonetheless, he views the psalms as focusing on two kinds of movement from one state to the other. The first move is from orientation to disorientation. That is a move from security to harm, from safety to trouble. The second move is from disorientation to new orientation. That is from the place of despair to the new hope. The whole of the Psalms is in Brueggemann’s view a description of the points along these movements and the movement itself.

Obviously this is a much simplified rendering of the argument, but I think for the most part that Brueggemann is on to something good here with the idea of these movements. It is always difficult to construct a framework that can contain the Psalms, but I think that Brueggemann’s approach might actually come close. If this goes as planned, we’ll look at the three categories of psalms in part 2, 3, and 4, and then my final thoughts in part 5.